HomeNotesFood for Thought: Classmates.com
804 days ago in 
Tags: food, for, thought
Reactions: 8 comments 3 points0 reports
 
 

Food for Thought: Classmates.com

Recently, the use of fake profiles has grown in the Dolphin community, much in part due to the recent addition of a modification which adds over three thousand people to your web site. However, many people overlook the issues with this, which can range from the simple closure of your community, to expensive lawsuits.

Recently, Classmates.com faced the worse of the two: an expensive lawsuit for deceiving people into believing their old classmates were using the service, when they actually weren't. The reason behind this lawsuit was due to the way Classmates.com sent advertisement emails, claiming that former classmates of the recipient were trying to contact them, and that they could catch-up with them if they purchased Gold membership. The only issue was, no one had tried to contact them, and it was instead a form of deceptive advertising to convince people to pay the $9.95 subscription fee for Gold membership. The lawsuit grew as more people filed complaints, and was later settled with United Online paying $9,500,000, all while admitting no wrongdoing.

This echoes the possible outcome of what has been going on with the use of fake profiles, which, to put it bluntly, is a deceptive, scam-like scheme to lure unsuspecting people into joining and using your web site. And if the web site requires a payed membership to access, the situation with Classmates.com is repeated, which can then easily result in not only a lawsuit, but criminal charges. This, combined with the fact that it can be assumed that many of the profiles (if not all)'s pictures and information were obtained without the consent of the actual person, raises the amount of consequences.

This serves as a warning to those using these fake profiles on their web site: they do not work, and will only result in your demise. While you will bring on people, they will quickly realize they are in the presence of thousands of "dummy profiles," and will not wish to stick around to find an actual person. And if you have charged for access to the web site, you have now committed a crime, and can face some serious consequences for your actions. And then we have the issue with the actual legal situation with the use of the profiles, as we are unaware of whether or not these were stolen from actual people, or if there is at least any part of it that was done so illegally.

Plussed by

 
 
 
 

Comments

Oldest First
|
Threaded
 
 
Please login to post a comment.
CodeSatori
Hear, hear. Lots of shady dealing going on in the dating and adult industries. The more software providers and their markets (as well as hosting providers) can marginalize or ban such practices, the better off we all are. I have often wondered who the people are in those fake profiles. If the photos and profile data have been collected from other sites without due consent, we're also talking about identity cloning, identity theft and all the rest of the fun stuff. All the while unwitting webmasters see more think it's just a "great way to make your site look bigger".

I wrote about SMS.ac in the comments to the other blog touching the issue; they received a £250,000 GBP fee and a ban for business in UK, and a F-rating from Better Business Bureau, as the fruit of their endeavors. The other blog being: http://www.boonex.com/unity/blog/entry/BoonEx_Sites
CALTRADE
I have seen one's that try to claim they are "for testing" but I always thought that was pretty lame. The one that is being advertised on the market now seems to be unapologetic about what it is doing. They even allow you to have fake "online status" so visitors will think there are a bunch of people online on your site - a lie within a lie. There products are developed with "intent to deceive" - the very definition of fraud. I really don't think they should be see more sold here.
mydatery
How could a profile grabber/creator/injector be for testing? I've often created profiles for testing a site while it's in build stage and have never found a reason to use any type of injection tool to create them. How does injecting the profiles into the DB test anything? I'd love to hear the modders input on this.
Zarcon
I think those fake profile mods are funny. Yeah, your site could have 10,000 members AND you can even make them come online randomly. But wait until a member send that fake member an email or an IM and get no responses.. I mean, the software is to be used for social interaction right?
Profesize
When a site uses these fake profiles they will inevitably get caught out. I remember seeing one site with over 10,000 members but the statistics box gave the game away as there were only a hand full of photos and very few forum posts........d'oh!

Not to mention the fact that no-one will reply to your emails or IMs or that its only ever you in the chat room. Its a sure way to doom your site.
Profesize
When a site uses these fake profiles they will inevitably get caught out. I remember seeing one site with over 10,000 members but the statistics box gave the game away as there were only a hand full of photos and very few forum posts........d'oh!

Not to mention the fact that no-one will reply to your emails or IMs or that its only ever you in the chat room. Its a sure way to doom your site.
ladybugn
What's so pissy about it is, it still works even when the customers know the profiles are 1 in 10 of real people. At ALT and AFF, we joke that we only thnk we have 56 friends, but it's really 7 friends with 8 profiles each. We accept it because of the 7 good ones.

What's even worse is that by signing up on their site, you allow them right to use your profile on all the sites in their network. Which most people don't notice until they find their profile on google in 8 sites they never heard see more of. That's just the misuse of real profiles. Then you add the fake community bundles. Egads.
 
 
 
PET:0.0730140209198