Very nice thread MD, really like the "new and improved" blogs, although I miss some of the old sarcasm (my opinion)
Fairly new to Dolphin, I visited Unity and Expertzz numerous times to find a mod that might add some functionality or customization to either a existing site or a project.
Now, I have enough common sense to not pay for a mod that will do something that can be found for free elsewhere or done with just a simple modification of the files. But sometimes there are mods that see more goes behind my technical knowledge (a most likely a lot of others).
Now I would never claim that Boonex should control or review any mods posted on the sites, and I understand perfectly that adding a mod to a site is at "one's own risks". Over time I have learned of whom is offering excellent mods and whom is not, mostly through the blogs, forum and comments. But what baffles me is that should Boonex be aware of someone being dishonest (and I do not mean because of "one" negative comment) but someome whom has repeatedly shown to be untrustworthy, I believe it is Boonex responsibility to ensure that the individual is removed and not allowed to return. And moreover not allowed to return under a different name. Failure to do so will certainly disgust the rest of us and thus spreading an unneeded distrust and apprehension amongst users.
As an exemple, I do miss Sammie, whose comments not only amused me but intrigued me aswell and were when read as a whole educational, yet she was banned as Boonex felt it was inappropriate and I do respect their decision. I just wish the same standards would apply to other areas of the Unity community.
Thank you