@HL - I'm just ranting - I generally try to be polite though. :)

@Andrew - fixing the issue is not a problem - once I discovered it I added a bunch of rules to take care of it - The issue is that this simply should not happen in the first place. If you know that you are changing this - include the rewrite rules as part of the upgrade, not as some additional hack hidden in the depths of your documentation.

This kind of stuff is what I previously blogged about - public perception - how your user-base see more perceive you. By doing stuff like this, you open yourselves up to criticism, and in this case I think that it is justly deserved.

I think that the whole migration package is about 50% of the job that should have been done. IMHO it simply is not good enough. All of the missing data fields could have easily been transferred, and this issue with url's changing should not even be a problem.

I know that I've barked on about my expectations from Dolphin previously with version 6, and there were those who said that my expectations were too high and vehemently defended Dolphin. But I am sorry - this stuff is not an interpretation of how something like a checkbox should function - this stuff is fundamental to how the web operates.

/DM