In reply to Making a case for subscriptions-based Market.
moonsoon2u•25th of January 2016
Ok guys i have a solution for you. Obviously permanent license and subscription are two different things. Customer can choose what ever they want. Now lets come to the subscription and vendor issue. Solution is if a customer buy a module and find it good. But don't want to pay monthly payment for that module. he should have option to buy the module with one time payment besides the existing payment he made earlier on monthly subscription. This way customer won't feel being stuck to monthly contract, see more
Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses
Andrew Boon•25th of January 2016•
Yes, since we're keeping the one-off fee option, this would be the situation with most modules. Some products may not be suitable for subscriptions at all (like, say, installation service) and some would only be suitable for subscriptions (like, say, hosting or administration service).
Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses
moonsoon2u•25th of January 2016•
My suggestion was only for modules, cause hosting and installation service can't be provide by vendor on your subscription package or can they?
Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses
Andrew Boon•25th of January 2016•
I don't see why not. Now we have "services" category in Market, but they are all either priced as one-off or just advertise here with payment processing on vendor's site. I think vendors should be able to offer things like, say, RMS hosting or "site administration" service with monthly subscription.
Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses
Below is the legacy version of the Boonex site, maintained for Dolphin.Pro 7.x support.
The new Dolphin solution is powered by UNA Community Management System.
The new Dolphin solution is powered by UNA Community Management System.
