In reply to Social Networking
CALTRADE
Did you ever notice that this kind of behavior is FAR more commonplace with sites that accept or encourage "anonymous communication"? Sites that use real names seldom have this issue - you almost never see people posting huge outbursts of obscenity on Linkedin - or Facebook for that matter. Anyone can find my real identity with a mouse click or two, but many people here have some play username, like "DarkAvenger" or something, some cartoon character avatar and a vague or non-descriptive see more profile. I believe this is part of the "culture" of an online community that is established shortly after it launches - and is tough to change. If a site starts with fake names, it would be difficult to encourage people to ever put in their real names.

If a site has the first 10 or 20 people post real photos, it is far more likely that others will post real photos. If, on the other hand, a site starts with cartoon characters for photos, then it will be much more difficult to get anyone to post real photos. Boonex, because of the way it was initially set up, is now mostly a fake name site. Because of the recent drama created on some of these posts, this site is now even generating fake profiles and attempts to game the voting system. No offense to people who like sites to be anonymous for one reason or another, and do not use their anonymity as an excuse to launch personal attacks, but this doesn't happen with sites that use real names.
Andrew Boon
I agree and believe that anonymity often kills manners. Unity should have been set up to use real names with an option to stay anonymous for people who don't want to post anything in public. We might have to think again about it.

On the other hand, some may see it as potential threat to their personas.

Linkedin is a good example, though.
DosDawg
i dont think it matters in reality who you are, if you use a real name or a screen name, an avatar or a picture of your mother in law, the person you are will be reflected in how you treat people in general. as to who you are and hiding your identity, that is personal preference, and there are many who choose to remain unidentified. my screenname is what it is, because that was something that i was tagged with back before there were a social network, heck for that matter before there was really an see more internet, or windows :). i have been using a computer online for most of the past 25 years, and i have seen many changes in the etiquette online. it really used to not matter, what your real name was or is, and for that matter, it really doesnt today, screen names or usernames have been a part of the internet for some period of time. its when those who have the bright idea to create multiple screen names with no accountability to the primary screenname, that things get out of hand.

yes linked is more of a business social environment, and nobody there has a problem with revealing who they are, or at least that is the way we perceive that to be. but can you be ensured that john johnson is really john johnson. no you cannot! that is still an assumed name or screen name, and we have no real faction in knowing anybody's true identity ever.

IMHO, if you choose to hide who you are, then you are doing that by choice and you have something to hide would be my belief. of course you get into the whole conflict with identity theft when you reveal too much information, and people (crooks by nature) tend to have more scams available to them, when a person uses their real name. but in general, you are who you are, and a screenname, or alias will not change that.

Regards,
DosDawg
 
 
Below is the legacy version of the Boonex site, maintained for Dolphin.Pro 7.x support.
The new Dolphin solution is powered by UNA Community Management System.
PET:0.037402153015137