ilbellodelweb
Let us explain our point of view ...

We began to sell in this market when the Dolphin was the most famous and popular social networking CMS and when price for the license was $ 99.00.
Our sales went very well and every day we had 5/6 new customers.

The current cost for a permanent license of Dolphin is $ 599.00.
Meanwhile they have spread very valid alternatives to Dolphin (Pligg, Elgg, Oxwall are free and for SocialEngine the price is $ 299.00).

This is why, in our opinion, Dolphin see more is sinking.
With him we are sinking we sellers.

For our company every year the business was reduced by about 50% despite we have introduced new products each year.
In the past we could only work on Dolphin, now we have to work on other CMS, we had to lay off some developers, we had to increase the cost of some products in order to continue to work on updates and provide support.
All this is to the detriment of customers.

We think that if Dolphin cost less (much less), Boonex and developers would have many more customers and sales.
This would allow us to reduce prices and provide more support (adding more human resources to this market).

In the past, the sales policies were very different than today and now we adapted with many sacrifices.
Now you ask to assess a sales system that is unacceptable to us and, if we understand it, in the price of our service there would be a fee payable to Boonex.

If this were to happen, we believe that almost certainly we would abandon this market definitely.
We cannot no longer resist yet to another change of the Boonex marketing strategy.

We are curious to know the opinion of the other major vendors in this market, although some are now gone and we imagine that the reason is the dramatic drop in sales.
The initial assumptions of when we started have been altered over time and the adoption of this policy would be the end for us.
Giovanni_m
I agree fully with what was written by ilbellodelweb, I do not think this is the best solution for a better market but I think they are much more useful the solutions for market improvement proposals from modzzz that a system of subscriptions that only kills the market.
A very relevant market is wordpress where there is not a "subscription system", just the "one-time payments".
This does not deter customers to use wordpress in fact is definitely the world's most popular CMS see more and this confirms that one-time payments not penalizes market in any mode.
To improve things it just takes more control on products placed in market and on the vendors.
in more exist two relevant problems:
1) if market not have many user that buy a subscriptions to $3 a month is impossible to finance the development and upgrading of the modules and this creating the risk that the user not have product upgrade because developer not have finances and abandon the boonex market, only one-time payments allows to finance the upgrading work with a lower number of sales.
2) in case of templates and many other modules with "open code" after is downloaded with only $3 dollars is impossible to impose deletion from a site if user suspend payments, for example if user suspend dolphin subscription and use dolphin with "free licence" what can do boonex to make sure that user cancel all modules already downloaded with only $3 dollars? for not mention those who use a nulled version in this case after have paid only $3 dollar and have downloaded many modules boonex not have any mode to stop the incorrect use of a modules.
Andrew Boon
Actually some WP plugins are also available through subscriptions now.

1. Depending on price and volume subscriptions may be more lucrative in long terms. One-off payments are good for immediate cash-flow. Vendors would be wise to offer both.
2. We're working on solution for that.
epaulo
From Andrews statements, I'd imagine that each module that's capable of monthly subscriptions will require some extra encrypted code to check whether the subscription is current or canceled. If canceled then the module would be disabled.

An advantage of Boonex developing a *good* reliant system for tracking subscription modules should be the ability to limit a customer's module usage to only one domain name (chosen by whoever is paying). Of course different modules could be used on different see more sites. I wonder how much money some vendors are losing each year due to their modules being used more times than they're paid for (not including duplicate test sites).
Andrew Boon
That's right. We're testing this on Trident now. Modules do have to include certain components that make them compatible with subscription-based licensing. And obviously this is one more reason why they have to be reviewed - both for buyer and seller protection.
Andrew Boon
Thank you for your input!

First, you won't need to adapt or change your strategy. You can continue as you do. You can, however, TRY to offer a couple of extensions as subscription service. Just try and see if you gather some subscribers and what sort of return it would bring for you.

And see... if we had subscriptions, say 5 years ago and you started gaining just 1 new customer a day, you'd have about 1500 clients now, paying a guaranteed 4-5K every month.

Anyway, it is important to understand see more that we don't plan this as a default policy or the only way to sell - it will only be an additional option. I can also think about something like, say, a package of all your mods bundled and offered for a higher monthly price, supported and updated. Or a number of different bundles.

As for Dolphin pricing and popularity... If you explore this, you'd see that pretty much every social CMS has sinked somewhat. We have spent a few years for Trident development and that also pushed us back. With $99/license price-point we couldn't sustain operation - support was overloaded, but revenue wasn't covering expenses at all. On the other hand, I understand that easier entry would make a big difference, and introduction of Trials and leased licenses already show improvements in general interest and activity. We are growing again.

And I've noted before that eventually we plan to make DolphinPro core package free, with separated modules for a fee (honouring all current licenses by keeping all Boonex modules free for them). We're already doing this with Trident and hope to implement the change in Dolphin within this year. This will make Market very active.
Giovanni_m
the main problem is that in the market the current situation is not 1 new customer a day but 1 new customer in a week "in the best of cases 2 new customer".. that way after one year at $3 a month will be able to make only "$144" max "$288" and this prevision is always if all customers will not abandon their projects, because perhaps many users in meanwhile switch to other cms or decide to stop their projects with Boonex, this can not finance an adequate support only see more a one-time payment may give finance to upgrade and support user in a market with this volume, regarding Wordpress also if will have a subscription system, I still have to see a plugin that uses this system, "perhaps 1%" i think 99% use one-time payment and the Wordpress market go very well so I do not think that the problem of Boonex is the method of payment.
Andrew Boon
It's just an extra option, which you might use for some products. If it gets new some extra clients, we're happy.
TravelNotes
Dolphin is pricing itself out of the casual market, for sure. As they do that and the vendors suffer, so do we, the established users. This wind of change can quickly turn into a cyclone.
 
 
Below is the legacy version of the Boonex site, maintained for Dolphin.Pro 7.x support.
The new Dolphin solution is powered by UNA Community Management System.
PET:0.048509836196899