In reply to Dolphin U Alpha 9

houstonlively•9th of December 2014

I'm trying to think of a good reason to keep two uploaders. Why not just ditch the 'simple' uploader?

Andrew Boon•10th of December 2014•to houstonlively

Alex will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that multiple uploads of any kind still have to rely on either Flash or Java to work. So, in some circumstanced multiple uploader may not be functional, and Simple uploader is a backup.

Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses

AlexT•10th of December 2014•to Andrew Boon

Multiple uploader isn't using flash, but since this is new technology it may fail in some browsers, so alternative way of upload is needed.

Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses

houstonlively•10th of December 2014•to AlexT

I don't suppose client side image resizing could be an option? FB has done this for years.

Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses

AlexT•10th of December 2014•to houstonlively

Current uploader can't do this, but we will investigate this feature for future releases.

Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses

gkcgautam•14th of December 2014•to Andrew Boon

The problem is not inclusion of multiple uploaders, but the way they have been included.
Only a single uploader should be displayed to the user depending upon the browser they are using. Simple uploader should appear as fallback for older browsers.

Dolphin should be smart enough to handle this trivial task on its own and users should not be forced to make the decision.

Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses

Andrew Boon•14th of December 2014•to gkcgautam

I agree. At current (testing) stage we'd like to have them both "at hand", but eventually should make just one showing.

Permalink•Reply•Plus•0 pluses

Blogs

Help

Product

Company