scriptologist
As for sellers, we need a dispute protection to avoid abuse. The mod should not be suspended unless proven broken by the moderator/s, say, it won't work as described. The moderator/s will test it only on the seller's demo site.
Nathan Paton
I disagree with only hiding products that may be broken. If a dispute is opened against a developer for lack of support concerning one of their products, and enough evidence is provided, the product should be hidden until the dispute is resolved.

If the dispute involves a broken extension, I do believe that extension should be tested by a moderator or higher on an environment recommended by the developer. In the end, I will only hide a product if there is evidence to support someone's claim over see more lack of support/faulty product/zombies.

I think hiding product can be used as both an incentive and a protective measure, but shouldn't be abused.
Zarcon
As I stated earlier, I'm not sure it would be exactly fair to 'hide' the product just because one person has sent an email and did not receive a reply the same day. We need a more detailed layout of how this should work. One detail would be 'What is an appropriate time frame to respond to emails/forum post regarding support'. 24, 48, 36, 72 hours??? What about vacations, weekends.. etc..
Nathan Paton
I agree, we shouldn't jump on hiding products without good reason. I think if the person has been waiting a week and heard nothing back from the developer, that would allow for hiding the affected products. I think developers should always announce when they are on vacation, and keep information about their support, such as where it's provided, what times, etc.

I don't view someone half a day for a reply as not receiving support. I view that person as just being impatient.
 
 
Below is the legacy version of the Boonex site, maintained for Dolphin.Pro 7.x support.
The new Dolphin solution is powered by UNA Community Management System.
PET:0.094460010528564